Jun 11, 2021

Supplier Diversity with Kaleida

3 min
We spend 5 Minutes with CEO & Founder of Kaleida , Jason Robertson on Supplier Diversity, the effects of bias' and how Kaleida came to be

Jason Roberts is the CEO & Founder of Kaleida International, the UK and Europe’s first and only online, fully inclusive B2B marketplace for tenders. For Procurement Buyers, Kaleida is a one-stop-shop helping them find, assess, and invite suppliers and diverse suppliers to tender.


Q. Who are you, and what do you do?

“As the Founder & CEO of Kaleida International, I build out the overall global growth strategy for Kaleida whilst focusing on developing strategic relationships with key partners. I am also involved in ensuring our supplier community has the most superior B2B platform experience possible.”


Q. Can you tell me about your experience prior to Kaleida?

“Well, I spent 24 years working in financial services. The first 11 years were spent within technology teams at investment banks, including JP Morgan, where I worked for five years. For the 13 years that followed, after leaving banking, I moved on to selling technology solutions to banks, asset managers, and hedge funds.”


Q. Do you feel like you were as successful as you could have been in sales? 

“No, not really. You see, people buy from people they know, trust or are familiar with, but I'm a six-foot-five black man, and most people in the room who I sold to or who were the decision-makers did not look like me..

“Whilst in the office one day, can you believe I was once told that I looked like the kind of person who would stand in a subway, with a hood on and mug people! That’s just one example of the   un/conscious bias and negative perceptions, stereotypes and tropes  I had to contend with  when I walked into an office building to sell my company's product, and I believe that affected my success.”


Q. How did that experience lead you to found Kaleida?

“Businesses owned by diverse communities experience prejudice too. Woman-owned, disabled owned, LGBTQ+ owned; whatever; all diverse communities experience prejudice, and as this was something I was familiar with, I wanted to find a way to help marginalised companies have a better chance of being successful.”

“You see, in the US, they've had the Dodd-Frank reform act for almost 11 years [enacted on July 21, 2010], and that has helped to encourage the use of underutilised communities. Over here in the UK and across Europe, we have nothing like that. So with no legislation to help us, I didn’t want technology or access to data to be an excuse or barrier preventing firms, who had committed to spending budget with Diverse Suppliers, from finding and spending with those communities, so this is why I built Kaleida.”

Q. What’s your end goal?

“I would like to see Kaleida IPO and believe we have huge potential to do so. After all, we need more black-owned business representation at the very highest level: on the FTSE, the NASDAQ and the DOW JONES. But until then, and with the world slowly but positively moving more towards equality, inclusivity, and diversity, I want to be at the forefront of helping buyers spend their committed dollar with Diverse Suppliers as that spend ultimately affects the outcomes of many other diverse-owned businesses across the entire supply chain.”


Kaleida helps Procurement and Compliance teams shave weeks off the time it takes to assess and source suppliers, bringing it down to a matter of minutes.

If you haven't checked out Kaleida's stunning website, you really should.


Share article

Jun 15, 2021

Germany Adopts Revolutionary Supply Chain Human Rights Laws

4 min
Supply chain legislation makes German multinational corporations legally responsible for human rights and environmental abuses across global supply chains

While the title states that Germany’s newly adopted that targets human rights abuse across global supply chains is “revolutionary” ─ which it is ─, it certainly shouldn’t be. But nonetheless, today, on June 11th, 2021, the German Parliament has ushered in a long-awaited shift to mandatory company compliance rules. After months of negotiation, the German lawmakers finally pushed it over the finish line within the final days of the current legislative period. The bill will see German multinational corporations held legally responsible for any human rights or environmental abuses found across their global supply chains. 

“The German government has taken a critical step to ensure that companies operate responsibly,” said Juliane Kippenberg, associate director, children's rights division, at Human Rights Watch. “Respect for human rights in global supply chains is not something that should be optional.”

This news comes at a time when global corporations are already being pushed towards environmental, social and governance (ESG) compliance, with a massive drive to reduce Scope 1, 2, and 3 carbon emissions from their supply chain operations and a concerted effort to avoid suppliers and manufacturers that do not meet the standards that industry-leading companies are now expected to meet. 

Who will the new law affect?

With Germany’s new legislation, organisations that fail to meet the rules and regulations could be forced to pay fines potentially equivalent to 2% of their annual global turnover. However, it isn’t applicable to all.

According to Reuters, under the act, companies above a certain size will be forced to establish set due diligence procedures that prevent the abuses; from 2023, only companies with more than 3,000 employees in Germany will be affected. From 2024, the rules will expand to companies with more than 1,000 employees. 

Statistics from within the country suggest that the first stage of this regulation rollout will affect 900 companies, while the second stage will put 4,800 companies under the spotlight. The bill will also enable the government to temporarily exclude from public tenders companies that receive fines in excess of €175,000. 

“Incalculable risks arise for companies,” said Joachim Lang, general manager at the Federation of German Industry. A word of warning from a respected leader, at a time when industry lobby groups and wholesale businesses fear that the new law increases bureaucracy and suggest that price rises may be inbound. 

The Take of German Giants

After looking at the incoming legislation, Daimler AG, known more commonly as the automotive giant Mercedes-Benz, a company which, should there happen to be any ESG-compliance issues along its multinational supply chain, would pay a hefty fee, is welcoming of the push for change but hesitant about certain aspects of the bill. 

“Daimler's position is: The respect for human rights is a central aspect of our sustainable business strategy. We, therefore, welcome the progress made on the Supply Chain Act. Although the regulations are very ambitious, the proposed legislation has a sound approach overall. It is based on internationally recognised human rights and on international agreements. And it gives companies more legal certainty in an area that has so far only been partially regulated.

Supply chains are not "chains" but rather exceedingly complex networks: Daimler alone has over 60,000 direct suppliers - and many more sub-suppliers. For this reason, we also consider the proposed risk-based gradual model to be sensible. The responsibility of the companies lies primarily in their own business area and with their direct suppliers. Companies must then take action in the deeper supply chain if there are concrete indications of human rights violations. Daimler AG already does that today. 

Even though we support the proposed legislation in principle, we consider some aspects to be critical, e.g. the planned fines of up to 2% of the average annual turnover. Instead of threats of sanctions, we consider concrete measures, which companies must take in the event of deficits, to be more expedient. In addition, certain wordings are still vague and leave room for interpretation. Terms such as, e.g. "fair standard of living" should be phrased precisely in order to create legal certainty. Furthermore, documentation and reporting requirements should not lead to unnecessary bureaucracy and should be harmonised with existing rules. On the one hand, this does not help the people on the ground, and on the other hand, it puts a burden on the companies – and the implementation can pose substantial challenges for smaller companies in particular.”

This law is arguably one of the most important developments in the supply chain space so far this year. But it must be remembered that changes do not and will not happen at the push of a button and that democratic principles should be applied to the discussion prior to enshrining legislation into tablature. Environmental and human rights advocacy is a hike, not a brisk walk around the park ─ so, for German companies, it’s time to get their boots on the ground and start assessing their global, interconnected supply chain operations. And, hopefully, they’ll set a stellar example for the rest of us.


Share article