How China's Export Restrictions Will Affect Battery Supplies

Share this article
Share this article
Prioritise Us on Google
Any disruption to the battery supply chains may have consequences for the worldwide sustainability outlook (Credit: ABT)
China’s proposed export restrictions on key battery technologies spark concerns over global supply chains while driving efforts toward resilience

Batteries form the backbone of the global transition to sustainability, powering EVs and renewable energy storage systems.

While technologies like semiconductors, wind turbines and solar panels play vital roles, batteries are pivotal in enabling the shift to clean energy.

At the heart of this global industry lies China, which dominates the export of battery technologies and the materials required to produce them.

However, China's control over the sector is under increased scrutiny.

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce recently proposed restrictions on exporting technologies essential for producing lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and lithium manganese iron phosphate (LMFP) cathodes.

These materials are critical components in EVs and renewable energy systems. This announcement has ignited debates about the future of supply chains and its broader impact on industries dependent on these batteries.

Youtube Placeholder

China tightens its grip on battery technologies

LFP and LMFP batteries, widely used for their cost efficiency and thermal stability, power nearly half the EVs on the market today.

China’s proposed export limitations suggest a strategic effort to secure its leadership position while navigating geopolitical tensions with the US and Europe.

John Passalacqua, CEO of First Phosphate Corp, connects the move to larger disputes in high-tech industries. “The first shot was fired by defence contractors and computer chip makers,” he explains.

John Passalacqua, CEO of First Phosphate Corp

“What's extremely interesting now is that China's response is not only in the chip sector but also in the lithium processing technology space.”

This is not just about maintaining market dominance; it’s also a matter of national interest. Batteries are increasingly intertwined with energy security and technological innovation.

By controlling the flow of vital technologies, China seeks to influence the global energy transition while shielding its competitive advantages.

A global market at a turning point

China’s restrictions could create immediate hurdles for battery manufacturers relying on Chinese materials, but they also present an opportunity for other nations to diversify their supply chains.

Western manufacturers, in particular, face urgent pressure to develop independent production capabilities.

Behnam Hormozi, CEO of Integrals Power, stresses this urgency: “The Western LiB ecosystem will now only succeed if they have access to a non-Chinese LFP/LMFP CAM manufacturing technology.”

Behnam Hormozi, CEO of Integrated Power

Despite the potential disruptions, some industry leaders foresee a gradual, case-by-case implementation of restrictions rather than sweeping changes.

Peter Willemsen, President of APAC at Webasto, says: “China will not drive this dogmatically but—in its typical fashion—in a trial-and-error approach. Some technologies for some companies may be impacted case by case, but there will be no blanket approach.”

Peter Willemsen, President of APAC at Webasto

This evolving landscape could spur new innovations and supply chain models outside of China. Peter suggests the shift could even help global industries “find a foothold back into electrification.”

Driving innovation and alternative solutions

The prospect of restricted access to Chinese battery technology is accelerating efforts to develop alternatives.

Sodium-ion batteries and novel lithium processing techniques are emerging as viable options. Some companies are already moving to adapt.

For example, Integrals Power has launched a pilot plant capable of producing 20 tonnes of LFP cathode material annually. By sourcing raw materials from Europe and North America, the company aims to reduce reliance on Chinese exports and build more resilient supply chains.

Dr Tara Lindstedt, Chief Development Officer at InoBat, cautions that for such initiatives to succeed, businesses must rethink profitability expectations.

“There is not enough margin in Western terms in the chemical sector,” she warns.

Dr Tara Lindstedt, Chief Development Officer at InoBat

“We need to change our mindset and curb the excessive greed for margins and ROI.”

The race for alternative technologies is also spurred by concerns over further restrictions.

Qianran He, an investor at TDK, notes: “First graphite, then LFP—there are more joining the ban list. It’s a long game, but we need to invest in alternative innovations now.”

Securing the future of sustainability

The timing of China’s proposed restrictions is significant, as the global push for sustainability gains momentum. Any disruption to the battery supply chain risks slowing progress toward net-zero goals.

As countries and industries adapt, the focus will shift to fostering local production and securing access to alternative technologies.

For many, this development signals the need to reduce dependence on a single supplier.

John offers a fitting conclusion: “This moment should serve as a wake-up call for the rest of the world.”

The uncertainty surrounding China’s restrictions underscores the urgency of building resilient supply chains and advancing innovation.

In the long run, these efforts could strengthen global progress toward a sustainable and electrified future.


Explore the latest edition of Procurement Magazine and be part of the conversation at our global conference series, Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE.

Discover all our upcoming events and secure your tickets today. 


Procurement Magazine is a BizClik brand.

Company portals