Jun 26, 2021

Proxima: The COVID Hangover

Proxima
Supplychainriskmanagement
COVID
SupplyChainDisruption
2 min
Spencer Shute, Consultant at Proxima, on the ongoing strain of everyday supply chains and their continued impact on retailers, restaurants and consumers

Spencer Shute, a Consultant at Proxima, a world leading Procurement and Supply Chain Consultancy and delivers true value in Procurement for some of today’s biggest companies speaks on how restaurants and the food industry are juggling the post Covid hangover with a sudden influx of demand.

“Every area of supply chain has been disrupted from ocean, air, truckload, to LTL. The explosion of e-commerce has grown the parcel environment exponentially. Some companies have strived, and some have struggled. Elements of logistics are re-adjusting to what they were before COVID, but there’s still a hangover with some of their business.”

A leading indicator of expansion in the economy is freight. Ocean rates are so elevated, and capacity is so tight at the moment, and the hits just keep coming to the industry. Inventories are at the lowest levels for most supplies.”

 

The Post Covid Rush

 

As the world opens back up again and demand spikes, Shute says food outlets and restaurants are finding themselves unprepared.  “For certain consumer-facing businesses such as food service outlets and restaurants, there is now a rush of demand, and some are unprepared. In certain sectors because of e-commerce growth, there is a shortage in warehouse workers and space for food distribution which impacts service outlets and restaurants. There is a premium for that type of labor. “

Labour shortages and warehousing issues continue to plague supply chains.  “The labor strain within supply chains and e-commerce will continue for the near future. If you look at the e-commerce effect, it has a 3 to 1 return ratio. Warehouse labels are sorting these boxes – it becomes labor intensive and impacts bottom lines. A qualified warehouse worker is now at a premium.”

The interconnectedness of supply chains permeat every industry, supply chain disruptions cause a seemingly never ending domino affect. So, what should we expect for the rest of 2022?

“Shipping issues at ports impacts everything and what we buy. For example, it might be something as common as the plastic trays where consumers grab to-go orders. When the ports are backed up, whether it be the raw materials, it becomes difficult to unbury.”

 “In 2022, we may see some softening to consumer demand. We are only 30 days out from heavier retail shipping, and that’s typically the barometer for freight. Last year, we saw the most elongated retail season ever. The 2022 retail season will be elongated and will hit consumer wallets.”
 

More on Proxima: delivering true value in procurement.

 

Share article

Jun 29, 2021

AICPA: The State of Risk Management

ERM
AICPA
riskmanagement
SCRM
4 min
We take a look at AICPA's 2021 State of Risk Oversight report to see how companies are getting along in their Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) processes

In the fall of 2020, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)surveyed 420 members of the AICPA’s Business and Industry group who serve in chief financial officer or equivalent senior executive positions representing different sizes and types of organisations— resulting in The  2021 State of Risk Oversight report.

Let’s review its key findings.

First, to ensure a clear understanding of our starting point, let’s review the drivers.

The report states that “risk volumes and complexities are at their highest level in 12 years, increased by significant events tied to COVID-19, social unrest, national elections, extremely low-interest rates, and a host of other risk triggers – no type of organization is immune”.

The supply chain disruptions brought on by the global pandemic changed the nature of top risks, with core operations having been significantly impacted by risk events, highlighting the need for improved risk management and continuity of business plans.

Organisations are also facing further pressures from stakeholders to provide more information on risk and mitigation strategies.

Despite the well-accepted need to better prepare for the unforeseen, only 30% of respondents report they are “mostly satisfied” or “very satisfied” with their organization’s Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).

From JIT to JIC—  When in Doubt, Stock

It’s been said that a companies shortcomings can be seen in its safety stocks. Safety stocks or increased inventory levels have their time and place and are a legitimate mitigation tactic. However, companies are often quick to jump from JIT to JIC in place of evaluated, strategic decision making where trade-offs are consciously made based on organisational objectives and values.

Although there is a growing trend towards increasing safety stocks and buffering supply chains, the report states that the majority of organisations have not taken the extra step of aggregating risk information to an enterprise-level inventory of top risks. Organisations continue to struggle in integrating a more formal risk management approach and implement strategic action plans.

Financial services aside, most companies are not considering risk exposure when evaluating possible strategic initiatives or making capital allocations. i.e., risk is not even considered when making some of the business’s most important decisions.

Critically for Procurement, who are often in the position of having to make those critical tradeoffs, most organisations do not formally articulate tolerances for risk-taking as part of their strategic planning activities. 

The report also highlights that there is considerable room for improvement when it comes to mitigating reputation and brand risk.

ERM— We’ve come some of the way, baby…

  • • While progress has been made in implementing complete ERM processes, more than two-thirds of organizations surveyed still cannot claim they have “complete ERM in place.”
  • • Public companies and financial services organisations exhibit the biggest move towards ERM in 2020. 
  • • With the exception of non-profit organizations, most types of organisations believe their risk management oversight is more robust or mature than any of the prior four years. But we aren’t quite there yet...
  • Fewer than half of respondents describe their organisation’s approach to risk management as “mature” or “robust.” 

The Impact Culture on Risk

Some organisations believe other priorities stand in the way of more advanced risk management and that risk is managed in more informal ways, impeding the move to ERM.

The report also indicates that most organisations fail to provide training or guidance on risk management. This can potentially lead to a lack of understanding of the imperativeness of proactive risk management efforts and their ability to improve a companies performance.

Furthermore, risk management is not incentivised, with few organisations embedding risk management incentives into performance compensation arrangements.

There seems to be a misalignment between a companies tolerance for risk and its risk management actions. Despite the majority of organisations describing their risk culture as “strongly risk-averse” to “risk-averse”, only a minority of respondents describe their risk management processes as “mature” or “robust.”

So, it would seem, organisations are aware of the heightened need for risk management, consider themselves to be  “risk-averse”, even perhaps strongly so, yet have immature risk management processes and a culture that impedes progress.

The question remains, what, if anything, will companies do about it?


For a detailed analysis that provides helpful perspective and benchmarking on risk management, download the  2021 State of Risk Oversight report.

Share article